Re: Can this loop be made faster ?
From: Annie (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Evenbit: "Re: Ignore MASM and it will go away"
- Previous message: Percival: "Re: When to use Rosasm, when to use Masm?"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Next in thread: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Reply: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:11:06 +0000 (UTC)
On 2005-02-28 BethStone21@hotmail.NOSPICEDHAM.com said:
> [ ... 224 lines snipped ... ]
>
> Ah, it's the same old, same old, wolfgang...nVidia, of course,
> have their "no documentation" policy and "binary only" drivers
> ...and they don't seem to want to give that up...
_____
Crikey...hasn't anybody dis- ((( `\
assembled and back-engineered _ _`\ )
an nVidia video driver YET? (^ ) )
~-( )
Wazzup with THAT? Where are _'((,,,)))
the hackers when you need'em? ,-' \_/ `\
( , |
Golly...guess I'm missing all `-.-'`-.-'/|_|
the "fun" by not using WinDoze. \ / | |
Hehehe! =()=: / ,' aa
- Next message: Evenbit: "Re: Ignore MASM and it will go away"
- Previous message: Percival: "Re: When to use Rosasm, when to use Masm?"
- In reply to: Beth: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Next in thread: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Reply: Robert Redelmeier: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Reply: Beth: "Re: Can this loop be made faster ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]