Re: Arrrrrrrrrrrrggggg!!

From: Sevag Krikorian (kahlinor_at_nop.yahoo.com)
Date: 03/02/05 

Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:09:07 -0500

NoDot wrote:
> Sevag Krikorian wrote:
>
>> The low-level assembler need not have any 'features.' Just the bare-
>> bones NASM syntax ( I think that's what they are gonig with anyway).
>
>
> Well, the assembler's opcodes are going to look like NASM, but Beth
> wants to add her Unified Model into the system.
>

"Unified Model" is a feature yes? Just get the basic assembler done
first, have something to show for it. Then as soon as the 'basic'
assembler can compile itself, add features as you see fit. 

-- 
[kain]
http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor