Re: International Peace March (19th / 20th March 2005)

From: \\\\o//annabee (http://TheWannabee.org)
Date: 03/19/05 

Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:34:59 +0100

På Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:54:43 -0500, skrev NoDot
<no_dot@msn.remove_this.com>:

> \\o//annabee wrote:
>> You talk *** of decent people, who do decent work. I was in a bad
>> mode. So you got it.
>> Anyway. The way you presented the idea was crap. Because I cannot see
>> how your idea is
>> anything more than what we call opening a file, writing something to
>> it, and have
>> another program, who understands the format, reading it.
>
> [Yawn] Perhaps it would help you if you understood that the idea is
> intended to be used in Operating Systems, not normal programs operating
> under other OSs (as it wouldn't be possible to impliment the idea
> without a lot of work). You also seem to not grasp that it's not like a
> file or surface: you never lock the object. It's a method of program
> communication in Real-Time.

??? How so ? Having a common memory area between two processes ? In
windows, it is called a filemapping. Across networks its called UDP, and
it is certainly not "real time", while this is simply impossible, as even
light speed isnt fast enough to cross the globe, in real time.

> IF you don't like it, then you can say so. I presented an idea, which I
> thought was interesting, and expected to be full of holes. If you have a
> hole, say so.

Ok. This is the holes :

You havent presented an idea at all, just a few words, its seems you dont
know what mean.
There are no grounds for evaluating you "idea", as there no scenario yet,
for imagining what it is :))) And what make it diffrent from what we
allready got. "real time" communication, isnt less possible, with the
tools we allready got.

You have failed to explain what problem it would solve, and how, and why.
Its actually, from your outline of your idea, impossible to even begin to
imagine what it could be used for.

This is more like dark matter :)))))))))) then a hole, if you ask me.

So, you need to put some more work on your idea, and present a scenario
where the idea might have some purpose, some usage, and explain why it
will be better, using your idea, then using what we allready got.

Maybe you really got a good idea :) And you just didn't manage to
communicate it so that we would understand. So then, maybe you should pull
your brain hard together, and try again. :))) I have to do this many many
times with my ideas.... its the way things are. Thats where the work is.

Good luck. I am not out to get you or anything, its just that I find it
very strange for someone to say that a man like Betov is not worth
listenting to, when Betov has actually implemented a WHOLE RANGE, of
beautiful, simple AWSOME ideas into his Development tools, while the
person doing the critic, failed to even communicate the first reason for
his ideas. 

-- 
http://TheWannabee.org
Quantcast