Re: International Peace March (19th / 20th March 2005)

From: Johannes Kroll (junk-mailbox_at_gmx.de)
Date: 03/22/05 

Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:40:12 +0100

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:51:42 +0100
"\\\\o//annabee" <http://TheWannabee.org> wrote:

> På Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:53:44 -0500, skrev Sevag Krikorian
> <kahlinor@nop.yahoo.com>:
>
> >> You should be very careful with supposing in your position. Its very
> >> likly that you'd be wrong.
>
> > Yes, a typical response from Betov victims these days.
>
> Because talking to trolls and idiots will make one frustrated. I did hard
> work to confirm that I wrote was correct, I went back to all the versions
> of RosAsm I have on my machine, and located the code in question in every
> single one, to find if this code was added before or after master PDF's
> visious lies.
>
> I also tried the supposed crashing code, just now, at there was _no_ bug.
>
> There could have been a bug, at the time Randall says = a crash, (Guga =
> Beyond2000, also confirmed this in one of his post, but *i* have not) but
> it COULD NOT be the symbolmanagment, because I have confirmed the dates.
>
> So, where Randall lies, is not that RosAsm had a bug, its when he claims
> that RosAsm symbolmanagment is useless (which he have posted many times).

Where? I didn't read that. But I only read through the post you linked here.

> Its been confirmed that it is close to the best, and that it was both
> faster and more accurate then Pauls code, when tested on my codebase.
>
> Can you say idiots anyone ?
>
> > Here are some facts for you:
> >
> > 1. Randall found a bug.
>
> Randall *produced* a bug, by trying to compile a dictionary. He didnt want
> to spend time on finding the source of the bug, but he spent time on
> produsing the bug. Since we know he would never consider RosAsm, the
> question is why ?
>
> Randall claimed the bug was in RosAsm symbolcruncher. This is now *proven*
> a lie.
>
> > 2. Other people (including myself) confirmed the bug.
>
> Lets here the details then.
>
> > 3. Rene denied there ever was a bug.
>
> Noone has denied a bug,

Well, Betov did write "There is no bug" here:
<http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.lang.asm/messages/4908669771919f94,62c24a7055cd81ee,768eb3abd43cb1e7,ec981da5b385965c,6a4b4a14033b05ee,04e4f69866de3ad6,6cf87b8f8e6e5fd2,0181371e81f05842,2739f258bac0baba,07c6e2c5e41623ca?thread_id=b8f51e297ed8fa27&mode=thread&noheader=1#doc_6cf87b8f8e6e5fd2>

>but there has been denied that it was because of
> symbolmanagement. Wolgfang, who is 300 times smarter than you will ever
> hope to become, also told he had confirmed the bug that crashed on
> Randalls demented test, was but a jump to fix. Rene ALLWAYS new this, but
> it was a low priority fix. As noone in their right mind, paste a dicionary
> into an assembler. If they do :>>> Dictionary-asses.
>
> Remember that this is the key point here. The symbolcruncher. That was
> what Randall blamed, but that was NOT the bug, at all. Unless you start
> showing some cards, and show you have done your homework I am not going to
> locate the exact place of the bug, because I very much convinced, I am
> just talking with two indecent shit and Troll-heads here.
>
> > 4. Some time later, Rene (or maybe Guga) quietly fixes it
> > (aparantly, since it doesn't crash anymore as you report).
>
> I do not know when this bug was fixed, but Guga POSTED about this bug.
> Guga posted about the bug, and confirmed it, a LONG time ago, in this very
> NG. The key point here is not the bug, it was real, the keypoint is that
> Randall said it to be the a bug in the Symbolmanagemnet, the hash
> algorythm and organization of the collisions.
>
> This was the lie. Two and two is still 4 Krikorian, even when you cant see
> it.
> So even when you are blind, doesnt mean that 2+2 isnt logical.
>
> > Here is some *actual* logic for you from the above data:
>
> You have no brain able to teach me about logic. Your performance is
> completly boring.
>
> > Buy since your idea of "logic" is actually a religion, you will
> > fail to notice these facts.
>
> You are stupid as a duck Krikorian. The logic here is insanly childishly
> simple.
>
> > Haven't you hanged yourself yet or do you need someone else
> > to do it for you?
>
> You are welcome to try Krikorian. Good LUCK.
>
>
>
> --
> http://TheWannabee.org

Relevant Pages

  • Re: International Peace March (19th / 20th March 2005)
    ... I also tried the supposed crashing code, just now, at there was _no_ bug. ... So, where Randall lies, is not that RosAsm had a bug, its when he claims ... that RosAsm symbolmanagment is useless. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: [SLE] find command in SuSE 9.2 dont work properly
    ... > Randall R Schulz wrote: ... > that sounds like a fault (or at least faulty diagnostics) to me ... find telling the user what happened, not a bug. ... A priori, that possibility must be considered, but the facts at hand ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: [SLE] find command in SuSE 9.2 dont work properly
    ... Randall R Schulz wrote: ... >>a find command exactly the same on every other distro and it works, ... but this is faulty logic. ... So maybe it's a known bug. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: maximum driver handles per process?
    ... but there is a good chance that it lies with synchronization). ... the problem may lie with some bug in IRP_MJ_CREATE ... I'm using Win2k, WinXP, Win03. ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • Re: [opensuse] openSUSE 10.2 - process mono defunct
    ... Linux system). ... Init _always_ reaps its children or descendants. ... Randall, thanks for explanation that gave me the answer on my question "What ... It is a bug. ...
    (SuSE)