Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Apr 2005 13:43:36 GMT
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1113829159.408965.88980
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
> Yet, when a product provides every one of the machine instruction,
> access to all the registers, and, indeed, is capable on a machine
> statement-by-statement basis of exactly replicating a product commonly
> called an "assembler", people argue to their dying breath that this
> product is not an assembler.
>
> Again, the bottom line is that the definition of an assembler is used
> to perpetuation political aims, not science.
The definition of what an Assembler is and is not
was formultated and known ages before you came out.
So, before trying to modify this definition to a
way that could satisfy your claims about your HLL
Pre-Parser, you have, first, to learn the basics
of Assembly.
Before this, as long as your competency level is
&NULL - not to say negative -, as demonstrated but
what you are trying to do, the only thing you can
do, on that subject, is to shut up.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org/ >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: f0dder
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- References:
- Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: Evenbit
- Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- From: randyhyde
- Does MSIL Qualify?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Randall Hyde lies go on
- Next by Date: Re: The Randall Hyde lies go on
- Previous by thread: Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- Next by thread: Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|