Re: Unicode Support
- From: "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:40:12 +0200
"Chewy509" asked about UTF-source-code:
Even the idea may not find many friends, ..
*tool size may explode if several UTF16-sets needs support
*loss on source-portability and general readability
*Net/NG-bandwidth
(my news-reader use 'Courier New, text-only', so I'd see only garbage)
...my new disassembler got separated decoder/interpreter routines,
so it is already prepared to output any syntax with any character-set.
At the moment it just output ASCII, UTF could be added easy.
But I think English is the proper language for technicians and
programmers. Without a global communication standard we had to
rely on Babel-fish, and its name include 'Babylonian confusion' ;)
__
wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unicode Support
- From: Chewy509
- Re: Unicode Support
- References:
- Unicode Support
- From: Chewy509
- Unicode Support
- Prev by Date: Re: maz v. taz
- Next by Date: Re: Does MSIL Qualify?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unicode Support
- Next by thread: Re: Unicode Support
- Index(es):