Re: Unicode Support

websn...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Chewy...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>

Point(s) taken.

> There are a number of proposed character sets still pending for
> approval for the next update. (One includes an interesting alphabet
> designed by some University of Toronto researchers to help retarded
> people.)

Any links? I know a few Star Trek fans tried to get Klingon and some of
the other scripts included, but IIRC UTC relegated those scripts to the
private use area...

> The standard does not say anything about whether or not any
> future encodings will include other redundant encodings that further
> complicates normalization.

I don't know if this has happened so far (which doesn't mean it won't),
but IIRC one the design goals was to ensure that this doesn't happen.
However I can understand your concern.

Darran (aka Chewy509).

.