Re: HAY BETOV, when will you fix the RosAsm data structures ?

<randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Have you encoded bitRake's Switch/Case macro yet? When you get that
> done, come back and talk to us about RosAsm's impressive performance
> compared with MASM.
>
Randy, perhaps you could have a look at the second switch/case macro
set I posted? The first, while supporting nested switch blocks and
pascal-style "range cases", wasn't the one I had in mind - the second
I posted is more impressive, it does bubblesort and binary-tree
partitioning with the MASM macro facilites, to do the binary search
'magic' that C compilers tend to do. Alas, I couldn't get it working.


.