Re: HLA v1.76 is now available

randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1114523449.589685.12620
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

>
> Betov wrote:
>> randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1114461998.030011.214730
>> @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > From a features point of view, HLA is one of the most
>> > powerful assemblers ever written.
>>
>> No. It is a weird HLL Pre-Parser, and nothing else.
>>
>
>
> So sez the author of one of the weakest assemblers around :-)
> Can't beat 'em? Slander 'em :-)

I am not 'slandering' any Assembler as you never
wrote any.

By the way, for some mysterious technical reasons,
my answers (i tryed it twice) to one of your other
bullshits, do not seem to ever come out, here.

So, here is it again:


> Hi All,
>
> One thing I'm thinking about for HLA v2.0 is an optimizer for the
> layout of variables in memory. To understand what I'm talking about
> here, consider the following variable declarations:
>
> static(4) // Align next var on 4-byte boundary
> d1:dword;
>
> static // Default is align on byte boundary
> b1:byte;
>
> static(2) // Align next var on 2-byte boundary
> w1:word;
> w2:word;
>
>
> static(4) // Align next var on 4-byte boundary
> d2:dword;
>
> [...]
>
> As I get farter along, I'll share the ideas I've come up with. In the
> meantime, if anyone else has done something like this, feel free to
> relate your expiriences.


You have nothing to "share" and no "idea coming up",
here, as all of this does exist, in RosAsm, since day
one.

By the way, pathetic idiot, the default must be "4",
and not "1".

:)

Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >







.

Quantcast