Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 16:20:32 GMT
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1114614885.745323.91970
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
> It *does* come as a surprise to people who want to control the
> placement of variables in RosAsm. If someone types:
>
> [a:B$ 1]
> [b:B$ 2]
>
> They probably wouldn't expect these two declarations to consume eight
> bytes in their static data's address space.
I do not think we have any user with an IQ low enough
for not writing:
[a:B$ 1
b:B$ 2]
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- References:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Prev by Date: Re: RosAsm injects extra bytes into your data
- Next by Date: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Next by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|