Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 16:29:09 GMT
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1114616914.963184.323790
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
>
> randyh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>> As for the first issue f0dder raises, the complexity of the
> algorithm,
>> what RosAsm is doing is *not* what RosAsm is doing. RosAsm simply
>> injects extra bytes between each declaration block
>
> Sorry, I blew this sentence. It should read "what I'm suggesting is not
> what RosAsm is doing."
Second read: Ah! Yes! You are right: You were _really_
talking of re-aranging the Variables in Memory, depending
on their sizes!!!...
Excuse me. This is so stupid, that i had to go to a wrong
interpretation...
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org/ >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Sevag Krikorian
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- References:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Prev by Date: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Next by Date: Re: RosAsm Team is Still Making Excuses
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Next by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|