Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: "Alex McDonald" <alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2005 10:36:58 -0700
Betov wrote:
> randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1114614885.745323.91970
> @o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
>
> > It *does* come as a surprise to people who want to control the
> > placement of variables in RosAsm. If someone types:
> >
> > [a:B$ 1]
> > [b:B$ 2]
> >
> > They probably wouldn't expect these two declarations to consume
eight
> > bytes in their static data's address space.
>
> I do not think we have any user with an IQ low enough
> for not writing:
>
> [a:B$ 1
> b:B$ 2]
>
> :)
Unless the two lines are generated with two separate macros. Macros
rarely have high IQs. The first macro would need to communicate to the
second that the declaration is unfinished.
--
Regards
Alex McDonald
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Betov
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- References:
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- From: Betov
- Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Prev by Date: Re: RosAsm injects extra bytes into your data
- Next by Date: Re: RosAsm injects extra bytes into your data
- Previous by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Next by thread: Re: Optimizing Static Variable Layout
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|