Re: Luxasm news
- From: Johannes Kroll <j-krollNO-SPAM-BLAH-BLAH@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 20:57:22 +0200
On Thu, 05 May 2005 16:44:05 +0200
"\\\\o//annabee" <http://www.TheWannabee.Org> wrote:
I'm not sure why you post this here. What I meant was that software
generally isn't "bullet proof", i. e. programs can still crash no matter
how careful you design/implement them. So a crash handler that tries to
save a backup of the current document is not a bad idea.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Luxasm news
- From: \\\\o//annabee
- Re: Luxasm news
- From: Betov
- Re: Luxasm news
- References:
- Luxasm news
- From: \\\\o//annabee
- Luxasm news
- Prev by Date: Re: Gratitude to MASM/FASM/HLA/etc. for doing it right
- Next by Date: Re: Luxasm news
- Previous by thread: Luxasm news
- Next by thread: Re: Luxasm news
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|