Re: MultiWindowed Adventure Game



> >
> > So, the intuitive "push (type byte 0);" doesn't work?
>
> It's a bleedin' immediate! What's it need a "type" for?
> Besides, Randy says "pushd (0);" is more intuitive. The
> cryptic "push (0);" apparently encounters an unexpected
> constant - "near << 0 >>", it helpfully points out...

I don't know that it's intuitive, but it's what other assemblers use
(MASM, in particular), so I just followed suit.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HLA and embedded controllers
    ... which is stronger than MASM's recusive macros. ... overloading allows you to overload instructions, impossible in MASM. ... MASM has those string functions I've mentioned and I've been able to ... HLL-like statements the two assemblers support. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Linker versus assembler
    ... FASM blows away RosAsm in every test I've run. ... MASM (which you also don't ... TASM "aren't actual assemblers" all you want, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA History
    ... > meaning of the brackets in the Intel Syntax. ... The part (of Masm syntax) that puzzles me is ... reasons you explained nicely a while back. ... > source code for other assemblers. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Does anyone want to raise a licence issue ?
    ... The last time I paid for MASM, ... It terms of *current* books, NASM is probably ... In any case, even if Microsoft *had* started giving MASM away first, ... carrying assemblers back then. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Will Betov continue to try and attack Microsoft ?
    ... more and more people are registering at the MASM ... More and more people are learing MASM. ... the documentation available for other assemblers. ... What "crusade against the GPL" are you talking about? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)