Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: Sevag Krikorian <kahlinor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:50:08 -0400
Betov wrote:
dunric@xxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1117426177.987842.91730 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
I'm a bit confused on why Betov is so against HLA succeeding.
I am against HLA because 1) it is not an Assembler, and 2) because it is deturning beginners from Assembly.
Got your facts bent again Rene? That's what _you_ do, and it's been proven.
Plus, i am not "against HLA succeeding". This is impossible, as HLA cannot succeed in any way. HLA is complete failure case and, dispiting the so called "success", with missleading beginners, it can't have real users writting real Applications, as opposed to the real Assemblers.
Rene, your projecting your own failures onto other products.
-- [kain] http://www.geocities.com/kahlinor .
- References:
- High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: dunric
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: Betov
- High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Prev by Date: Re: Longhorn is rapidly becoming MS' "Copland"
- Next by Date: Re: Longhorn is rapidly becoming MS' "Copland"
- Previous by thread: Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Next by thread: Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|