Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: "Charles A. Crayne" <ccrayne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:19:54 -0700
On 30 May 2005 10:23:42 -0700
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
:I can't imagine what
:you're posts would be like if you'd had to put up with five years of
:this.
Oh, probably about the same as they are now. It's not that I don't feel the
temptation to verbally grab someone by the scruff of the neck and shake
vigorously, it's just that I have learned, over the years, that all it
accomplishes is to lower oneself to the other's level.
-- Chuck
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: randyhyde
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: Jim Carlock
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- References:
- High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: dunric
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- From: randyhyde
- High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasons for a buffer or RAM
- Next by Date: Apple went far beyond Xerox, was Re: Longhorn is rapidly becoming MS' "Copland"
- Previous by thread: Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Next by thread: Re: High Level Assembly (HLA)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|