Re: Need reviews of HLA Adventure

randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait
news:1117546428.310512.4740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

>
>
> Betov wrote:
>>
>> Then, as
>> no existing Asmer, on earth, would have ever considered
>> the possibility of using that ***,
>
> Certainly, I was under the misguided impression that existing
> programmers would recognize how much more powerful HLA was than MASM
> was (and still is) and I figured they would consider this and switch
> to HLA. I was wrong for some very obvious reasons:

Oh, you don't need to explain the reson why. Everything
is 100% clear: No Asmer on earth would have ever used
your packet of ***, and so forth you choosed to deliberatly
misslead the beginners as they are supposed to be way easier
victims. Simple.

:)

>> Now, you also claim (liar second shot) that you started
>> HLA at the same time i started RosAsm.
>
> No, I made no such claims. I claimed that I started HLA in 1996
> (shortly after the aforementioned discussion with my department
> chair). Though I didn't post anything to the newsgroups announcing
> "Hey, I'm going to start writing a new assembler", it's fairly easy to
> verify all this by considering the dates of the last work done on the
> UCR Standard Library (which I abandoned when I started to work on HLA)
> and the end of the updates to AoA/16-bits). And given that the
> original HLA system was on the order of 100,000 lines of code (without
> even considering the HLA Standard Library, another 30-50,000 lines of
> code), logistically it's not unreasonable to expect that work on the
> HLA system began *long* before the Sept/Oct release dates for
> v1.0/v1.1.

You can twist the facts the way you like to try to match
with your swindling, but you are going to have some hard
time with all of this. You have to choose:

Either you started your pathetic HLL Pre-Parser ages ago,
and then, given the state of the Tool, you are utterly
incompetent (all of the Actual Assemblers Authors wrote
their REAL ASSEMBLER in 2 years or so -way less for
Jeremy...-), or you started recently.

Either your Lines numbers are one of your usual swidling
or you do not know how to write, at all, because "100,000
lines of code" for an HLL Pre-Parser is simply ridiculous.

:)

Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >






.

Quantcast