Re: Need reviews of HLA Adventure

randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1117547376.447547.268510
@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

>
>
> Betov wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hard days ahead for IDA Pro... :))
>> >
>> > At least you know how to make jokes.
>>
>> Yes, but, here, there is no joke. RosAsm Disassembler
>> is actualy already, and evidently, better than IDA on
>> many points, particulary on the so important point of
>> the Automatic Recognitions of what is Code and of what
>> is Data.
>
> :-)
> This, from the guy who claims he doesn't use IDAPro. :-)

I do not have to:

1) I do not use Commercial Products.

2) I base my words on the ones the main Author of IDA
wrote, right here.

3) After _you_ had claimed, in the past, that IDA was
better than RosAsm Disassembler, I have challenged you
to disassemble a small app with IDA and to recompile
it. I even gave you an example that i knew to be easily
Disassembled and re-Assembled, by RosAsm, and that was
choosen small enough to not give you too much work to
do... Still waiting for any answer...

:)


>> It also beats IDA hands down on the point that it can,
>> in a significative number of cases, _re-compile_ the
>> disassembled Application, what no other Disassembler
>> can do: IDA does not even _TRY_ to disassemble the
>> Resources, by the way... and would anyone try to re-
>> compile a Disassembly Listing from IDA, (or from any
>> other Disassembler), on any App not having Resources
>> inside, to reduce the difficulties, it would much
>> probably not work, in most cases, even on the simpler
>> Demos.
>
> Actually, you are quite correct. IDAPro isn't intended for source code
> [...] people don't use disassemblers for that purpose. The vast
> majority of people using disassemblers use them for reverse engineering
> (in which case the *last* thing you want to do is to use the code that
> the disassembler produces, that's a clear copyright violation) or
> researching subversive programs (i.e., viruses).

Aaahhhh!!! here we are.

:))

For sure, if IDA cannot do the job, whereas RosAsm
_can_ do the job, the conclusion is quite trivial:

"RosAsm is a pirate Tool".

:)) :)) :))

Poor ass-hole.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Interesting Correspondence with the Manager (Pierre Vandevenne) of www.datarescue.com
    ... Interresting information: IDA Does not reassemble. ... RosAsm "Two-Clicks-Disassembler-Reassembler" does, ... RosAsm Disassembler does. ... IDA does not care of VB ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • De- Evolution
    ... > RosAsm Disassembler-Reassembler is actually (developement ... disassembler *doesn't* disassemble anything properly. ... RosASM as long as you take the attitude "I'll get around ... recursive macro invocations. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
    ... You are mistaken in asuming that all RosAsm users are only the ones ... But you guys have claimed how great your disassembler ... The goal is translation of libraries to pure assembly code, ... insetad simply you do as in other assemblers that is.. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Interesting Correspondence with the Manager (Pierre Vandevenne) of www.datarescue.com
    ... Open Sources and GPLed beats IDA hands down. ... RosAsm is also interrested with what is Data and with what ... them before we decide that the Code vs Data Recognition ... >> part of RosAsm DisAssembler, and let us have a good laugh ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Renes Revisionist History, Again
    ... When I said the apps "sucked hard", ... I was astonished that even Rene would use a few simple "hello world" ... examples as proof that RosAsm is "the fastest, ... >> have you seen how poorly it works compared to a real disassembler? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)