Re: Assembly Rebirth is a false hope



Betov wrote:
>
> If so, why don't you _learn_ Assembly

Been there, done that. About 25 years ago I might add. I've even
*taught* a few people assembler over that time period. Maybe you've
heard?

> instead of writting
> stupidities about the serious works done by others?

Aha!
We get to the point. If you want me to stop writing "stupidities" about
your work, you know how to do it. Stick to your own product and quit
trashing other people and other products. You can't imagine how happy
I'd be to leave you alone to your own little insignficant product. You
have complete control over me. Shut up, and so will I. But as long as
you continue to bad mouth me, Hutch, HLA, MASM, Tomasz, and anyone else
around here, I will continue to keep hounding on you, fatiguing you in
the process. You've demonstrated that you're not amazingly productive.
Don't you think you'd be doing your users and your product a big favor
by concentrating on your product rather than everyone else's products?

If you really believe you have the answer to the world's programming
problems, prove it. Rather than complaining about other produces and
people, give us a product that proves you are right. If you are right,
and HLA is an insignificant P.O.S., and I'm a vile liar, and MASM is a
joke, and Hutch is the ***** one, then the moment you give the world
this product you keep talking about, Hutch and I (and HLA and MASM)
will not be long for this world, eh? If you want to get rid of us,
quit wasting your time with useless banter and *produce* something.

BTW, lest you get excited that you're wasting my time, just keep in
mind that over the past five years of our exchanges I've managed to
produce 76 releases of HLA, written three books (soon four), gotten
about half-way through a complete rewrite of HLA, and I've still had
time for outside interests such as music performance and production.
You don't seem to be affecting my productivity *too* much. It's all
been fun (I chalk all your nonsense up to "recreation" time) for me,
but given the progress on RosAsm, particularly considering that you
work on it full-time (being retired and all), I suspect that you cannot
afford the time you waste around this newsgroup. Again, you want to to
shut up, you know how to do it. And let me give you a hint, continuing
to respond to this posts is not how you're going to achieve that.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HLA v1.93 is now available
    ... MASM does branch displacement optimization. ... would anyone want to use an assembler that forces *them* to do this ... NASM as a back-end to HLA? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: HLA v2.x and / or LASM suggestion: Win32 Resources
    ... >> Beth, now it's obvious, you spent to much time with HLA. ... >> an assembler and therefore also an exe file with an included ... "RC" tool effectively means that you can't really put resources ... MASM because it won't do "flat binary" (when you say "any true Low ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: What is this code doing?
    ... > Implying that MASM is an abomination? ... Unless you're thinking that HLA ... MASM's macro facilities way back in 1996 when I was driven ... in the high-level assembler arena. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Rocket Science
    ... >> Also, logically, if MASM is the underlying assembler being used by ... then MASM must always be being run in addition to HLA so ... the MASM or FASM or whatever underlying assembler's speed into its own ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
    ... HLA, why would they even come you your forum? ... becoming RosAsm users). ... needs to learn assembly language. ... I do think it would be much more an improvement you write an assembler, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)