Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jun 2005 08:36:02 GMT
Sevag Krikorian <kahlinor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:d9af2p$p55$1
@domitilla.aioe.org:
> Yes, you are missing a lot actually.
> -no jump optimization
It does not need any, as this is part of the syntax.
> -no type checking
If you mean "HLL Type Checking", no. There is no HLL
Type Checking in Assembly, and the day a Programming
Tool includes this, it is no more an Assembler.
> -no object code generation
???
> -no 'easy' way to make changes to the header or linking process
??? There is no header and no Linker...
> -no use on the significant free operating systems.
ReactOS.
> -no true structure support
Main Menu / [Side Kick] / [Structures]
>> Anything wrong with the original Caret Management? Already
>> seen a Caret behaving like this in another Sources Editor?
>> Any inconvenient?
>
> Caret Management? You mean like the "right click" which the
> other editors do with differnet buttons?
Oh! You don't even know what a Caret is... well...
> Other than that, it's missing useful features:
> -no drag-drop
???
> -missing edit menu
Missing spectacles?
> -it has a gimped context menu and only when text is selected
Yes, this is one of the interresting feature:
Float Menu Items depend on the selected Item.
> -no block selection features like comment/uncomment,
There are Multi-Lines Comments.
> indent/outdent
There is a Block Indentation, back and forth,
with respect of the Labels Pos.
> -no columnar block selection
No.
> -no line folding
The Instructions can be Multi-Lines.
> -no locking/unlocking important text blocks.
?
> -no bookmarks
Two kinds of BookMarks.
> -missing carot management features like deleting to end of word,
> to beginning of word
? I suppose you mean "caret" and "end of Line"...
No, there is none.
:))
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- References:
- Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: dunric
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: NoDot
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Charles D. Quarles
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: randyhyde
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Sevag Krikorian
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Ludwig Hähne
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Betov
- Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- From: Sevag Krikorian
- Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- Prev by Date: Re: Blueflops ate my X
- Next by Date: Re: Rene's Revisionist History, Again
- Previous by thread: Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- Next by thread: Re: Randy vs. Betov: from an outsider
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|