Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jun 2005 13:23:47 GMT
"Randall Hyde" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:XISve.9999$jX6.3270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> "Betov" <betov@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:XnF968261172FBE9betovfreefr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > Rene has stated that RosAsm has the most powerful macro system
>> > around.
>>
>> Lie.
>>
>> I wrote that RosAsm has a very powerfull Macros System.
>> Not the _most_ powerfull.
>
> Okay, then. Even *that* statement isn't true. RosAsm has one of the
> *weakest* macro processors of any assembler I've seen. The mere fact
> that conditional assembly was only recently added to RosAsm (after six
> years of development!) demonstrates the RosAsm development team's
> committment to producing a high-powered system :-(.
Maybe, the fact that the RosAsm users _DO_ make
a significative _USAGE_ of RosAsm macros (up to
create their own "Private Language"), whereas the
other Assemblers' Users usually don't, tells more
about it, than any of your insanities, ass_hole.
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- References:
- A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- A challenge for RosAsm
- Prev by Date: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by Date: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|