Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:56:34 +0200
"hutch--",
| Make sense of this to me. An 8 bit hex editor can edit single bytes in
| hex, what is the gain of going 64 bit particularly when you are still
| writing 1 byte at a time ? I can understand interface improvements and
| additional facilities on a later OS but I don;t see the gain for
| editing hex.
Yes I can edit every or even better every one single byte in an instruction.
Guess how many single byte instructions are available in 64-bit mode...
__
wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- References:
- A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- A challenge for RosAsm
- Prev by Date: Re: Click...
- Next by Date: assembly functions ans c++ classes
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|