Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: "Randall Hyde" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:17:20 GMT
"Betov" <betov@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XnF96829F9F6F032betovfreefr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Maybe, the fact that the RosAsm users _DO_ make
> a significative _USAGE_ of RosAsm macros (up to
> create their own "Private Language"), whereas the
> other Assemblers' Users usually don't, tells more
> about it, than any of your insanities, ass_hole.
Well, no doubt a higher percentage of RosAsm users write their own macros
than any other assembler. Of course, the mere fact that *you've* written
your own language pretty much makes this statement true. When a product has
as few users as RosAsm, it only takes one or two users to skew the results
:-).
As for the other assemblers, I've seen lots of complex macro packages for
MASM, FASM, and HLA. Macros that use facilities that don't exist in RosAsm,
btw.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- References:
- A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- A challenge for RosAsm
- Prev by Date: Re: RosAsm macro example from its author
- Next by Date: Re: assembly functions ans c++ classes
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|