Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:22:57 +0200
My opinion about Macros:
* + reduces source size
- on cost of 'direct readability'
- bloats the .exe (in hidden form)
* + minor convenience for lazy programmers
* - any change in it will affect many program parts.
So if I need several similar code parts, I either
write one routine which cover all wanted variations, or
I just copy/paste and modify as desired.
And I never would hide any code block, as parts and trails
often can be used more than one time, so I must see it.
__
wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- References:
- A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- A challenge for RosAsm
- Prev by Date: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Next by Date: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Index(es):