Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2005 09:47:42 GMT
dunric@xxxxxxxxx écrivait news:1120096569.485582.258780
@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
> Are you sure?
>
> Paul
I wrote Asm since the ages of the first Amstrad PC 1512.
So, i suppose i know something about waht Assembly is.
HLA is an HLL Pre-Parser, and nothing else.
I have nothing against HLL Pre-Parsers, as long as they
are introduced as _Hll Pre-Parsers_. But if you mean to
convince any real Assembly Programmer, that HLA is an
Assembler, you are going to have hard time(ssss).
Also, as an HLL Pre-Parser, HLA is not very good. Awfull
syntax, extreemly slow (because badly written) none of
the advantages of the real HLLs, none of the advantages
of the real Assemblers, all of the inconvenients of the
real HLLs, all of the inconvenients of the real Assemblers.
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: Jonathan Bartlett
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- References:
- Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: dunric
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: Betov
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: dunric
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: Betov
- Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- From: dunric
- Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Prev by Date: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Next by Date: Re: Click...
- Previous by thread: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Next by thread: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|