Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:53:43 +0200
"hutch--"
[..]
| Must be fun with a magabyte of source in hex. :)
Isn't magabyte == 1/NegaByte (US/UK: NiggerByte) ?
FYI: Hex-coding doesn't use/need any source,
and one MB of machine code (without data yet) would cover almost
"all" functions ever possible in everyone's imagination.
I cannot think of any function-module which could exceed 32KB pure code.
Of course modules can call each other functions to achieve very complex
algorithm.
i.e. my latest disassembler (hextutor) contain two main modules,
the decoder (16/32/64 bit) is <8KB code including all tables and
structures and the interpreter (with many output options) which
is 4KB code and ~8KB text. All together are 20KB, how large is your
MASM written MACRO-using multi-mode/multi-syntax disassembler?
__
wolfgang
.
- References:
- A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Betov
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: Randall Hyde
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- From: hutch--
- A challenge for RosAsm
- Prev by Date: Re: Click...
- Next by Date: Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website
- Previous by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Next by thread: Re: A challenge for RosAsm
- Index(es):