Re: Article about HLA on Linux Journal's website

Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:42c4061d$1
@news.tulsaconnect.com:

>
>> I wrote Asm since the ages of the first Amstrad PC 1512.
>> So, i suppose i know something about waht Assembly is.
>
> By those same qualifications, it would seem that Randall Hyde would,
> too. Why should we take your opinion over his? Simply asserting your
> authority in the area would imply his as well. If you discount
> Randall's qualifications, then insisting on your own as a designation
of
> truth is a double-standard.


The fact that Master Randall Hyde is an insane ass-hole
and a swindler has nothing to do with my "qualification".

I do _not_ "insist on my own" qualification. I don't care
about having the biggest ***, and i have nothing to sell.

Why would one "take my opinion" instead of Master Pdf
one, is because i wrote 3 Megas of working Assembly
Code, including, among many other things, an Assembler.

As opposed Master pdf job is to... write Pdfs... and
his most evident qualification is at swindling. Not
considering Hutch--, who is now a poor old thing of
the past, Master Randall Hyde is the individual, who
did the most damages to Assembly, for the only benefit
of his "personal fame and glory selling".

So, asking about the relative "qualifications" of such
an individual and of me, on an Assembly News Group, is
nothing but a scandal. More than that: Would Master
Pdf be "more qualified" than i am, his vileny would be
ever _bigger_.


Betov.

< http://rosasm.org >



.

Quantcast