Re: Which assembler can handle the BIG stuff ?



The_Sage wrote:
>
> >It is quite amusing that you're quoting yourself here. :-)
>
> It is even more amazing that I am not :^)

?????

Boy, you're really getting senile. Let's take a look at things here:

Post by "The_Sage" on July 6, 7:47pm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


>Reply to article by: randyh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date written: 6 Jul 2005 08:05:10 -0700
>MsgID:<1120662310.103453.155...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>GetProcAddress. Windows' API names are case sensitive.
>>I know, but I print them in all uppercase in essays, since they are easier to
>>read then.
>Obviously, your lack of knowledge concerning the graphic arts,
>typography, and psychology is just as lacking as your knowledge of
>assembly language.


You lack references to back up that assertion, as usual for you. It is
a
personal preference so your point is pointless. I've stated my reasons
for
writing an essay (and not code, since that is impossible) using
functions in all
caps, so it is perfectly okay, even if it does annoy you.

The real point here is that you have no valid argument to discuss
against
anything technical that I've mentioned, hence the reason you didn't
touch that
subject.


Why is it all you can do is go off on petty little tangents like
newsgroup
formatting or spelling or your usual immature name calling? Don't you
have a
shred of dignity and professionalism? Almost everyone of your posts
sounds like
it was written by an immature junior high student. I mean you call
people names,
you insult others that disagree with you or aren't as "smart" as you
imagine
yourself being...I'm surprized your vocabulary doesn't include words
more suited
to your mentality, words like pee-pee, poo-poo, ca-ca. You are so cute
Wandall,
calling everyone names and having a temper tantrum when people disagree
with
you.


But my advice is: Grow up you little twerp.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I especially want to draw your attention to the third new paragraph of
this post, especially the first sentence where you say: "Why is it all
you can do is go off on petty little tangents like newsgroup
formatting or spelling or your usual immature name calling?"

Then, on July 9th, at 12:55am, you write:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
178. The_Sage Jul 9, 12:55 am show options

Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm
From: The_Sage <The_S...@xxxxxxx> - Find messages by this author
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 21:55:50 -0700
Local: Sat,Jul 9 2005 12:55 am
Subject: Re: Which assembler can handle the BIG stuff ?
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse



>Reply to article by: randyh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date written: 6 Jul 2005 18:03:33 -0700
>MsgID:<1120698213.797533.230...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Why is it all you can do is go off on petty little tangents like newsgroup
>>formatting or spelling or your usual immature name calling?
>and then later:


Translation: You are right Sage, I can only go off on petty little
tangents,
like the constant name calling and insulting that is my trademark, and
since you
only want to be serious and discuss things from a factual and mature
point of
view, then see you later.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Now the "Reply to article" line has my name on it, but you'll notice
that the sentence you're refering to has ">>" in front of it, meaning
that you're quoting something *I* was quoting (which is from *your*
original article). Just as you can't read articles, it appears you
can't read posts in newsgroups, either.

Then, I said:
"It is quite amusing that you're quoting yourself here. :-)"

To which you replied on July 9, at 10:56pm:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It is even more amazing that I am not :^)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I guess, in a technical sense, you are correct. What you're really
doing is quoting me quoting you. But anyone who is capable of doing a
trivial transitive closure operation can immediately see that you were
commenting on a statement you'd made in an earlier post.

It is quite amusing that you don't *think* that you are quoting
yourself (indirectly or otherwise). Getting a bit senile are we? Can't
keep track of what you're saying around here? Quite honestly, I think
the real problem is that you're using an array of JMP instructions to
keep track of thing and only indexing into that array as you would a
standard JMP table and you're getting all screwed up. :-)
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages