Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: "hutch--" <hutch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 07:07:35 -0700
smile,
> "This is _not_ simply a Program".
Who said it was even a program ?
So Betov now says he is the spokesman for what GPL is. Step aside the
GNU organisation, Betov has landed. Now the problem with this is Betov
does not own the name GNU or GPL so while ha may make outrageous
claims, he does not define the GPL licence.
The licence that Betov supplies with his crayon scribblings is NOT GPL
but a component of the BLS (Betov Licencing System) which Guga screwed
together for him as he does NOT support either the GPL licence or the
GPL operating system in LINUX.
Come on Betov, when will you come clean and admit that you are ANTI-GPL
and don't support the GPL flagship LINUX. To put it in Betov's own
words,
"but... the fact that is does not is simply unhonest and incoherent."
Betov sees the GPL licence as dishonest(corrected spelling) and
incoherent. You cannot get it much clearer than that, Betov from his
own mouth is ANTI-GPL.
Noting that Betov has shot himself in the foot so many times, he has
little below the knees left, he also does not have a leg to stand on
claiming that he supports GPL when out of his own mouth comes such
abuse of the system that provided LINUX as a free operating system.
SHAME ON YOU BETOV !!!!
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
.
- References:
- HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Betov
- HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Prev by Date: Re: Which assembler can handle the BIG stuff ?
- Next by Date: Re: Best Compiler
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Next by thread: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|