Re: Best Compiler
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 06:38:09 -0700
Betov wrote:
> "ask4code@xxxxxxxxx" <ask4code@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait
> news:1122433800.292790.166320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > Hi there can any one tell me what is the best assembly (assembler) or
> > (compiler) for Linux OS i am using MASM for Windows OS so i am looking
> > for best one with closer (syntax) and how to use High Level C Function
> > on Linux (System Call) is't as easy as MSAM invoke or call?
> > Thnx aLL
>
> Only one serious way: FASM.
See point (4) (Rene [Betov] knows nothing about Linux, don't believe a
word he says).
>
> Take care of the HLA lies and propaganda.
See point (2) below.
> Randall Hyde
> is there for no reason but for selling himself at your
> expense.
See point (1) below.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
There's no need to respond point-by-point to any Rene ("Betov")
Tournois post. His posts are all repetitive, saying the same nonsense
over and over again. Therefore, we'll just use "canned" responses to
answer his
nonsense.
Here's the key to use:
(1) Rene's continued personal attacks on people and name-calling,
(2) Rene's continued attacks on products,
(3) Rene making unsubstantiated (and ridiculous) claims about RosAsm.
(4) Rene making ridiculous statements about other products, of which he
has no knowledge.
.
- References:
- Best Compiler
- From: ask4code@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Best Compiler
- From: Betov
- Best Compiler
- Prev by Date: Re: Which assembler can handle the BIG stuff ?
- Next by Date: Re: Best Compiler
- Previous by thread: Re: Best Compiler
- Next by thread: Re: Best Compiler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|