Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 17:03:51 GMT
"Alex McDonald" <alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1122481845.757182.64580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>> The RosAsm License is a "GPL-Enhanced License".
>
> That's so? How about GPL-reduced, as you're taking away freedoms it
> expressly allows?
Depends on who is looking at it, probably.
:))
>> This means that, basically, it is the GPL, that is re-inforced
>> but additional consideration, that expressively "_discriminate_
>> against some persons and some groups of persons".
>>
>> I had an email exchange with the Author of the GPL, after a
>> public discussion, that i had called "GPL not enough", where
>> Richard expressed his opinion: "The Enhanced GPL is no more
>> the GPL".
>
> Boy, did he see you coming.
No, he did not, but this is not a problem.
:)))))
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- References:
- HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: hutch--
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Betov
- Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- From: Alex McDonald
- HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Next by Date: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Previous by thread: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Next by thread: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|