When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- From: "hutch--" <hutch@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2005 16:34:01 -0700
Contrary to Betov stated view, the licence for RosAsm is definitely NOT
a GNU Organisation GPL licence, it is a licence written by Guga for
Betov with his RosAsm project. Now this is of course Betov's right to
licence his software in any way he likes but it is directly DISHONEST
to claim that it is a GNU Organisation GPL licence when it is not.
Betov imposes conditions on a user over and above the GPL system and
this is while supporting the proprietry Microsoft Windows operating
system and a dead in the water clone of it. GPL has its major working
example in the LINUX operating system that was built under the GPL
licence yet Betov does not support the GPL flagship, he is a WINDOWS
man.
Claiming to be GPL when it clearly is not is a COPYRIGHT VIOLATION of
the GNU organisation. Betov needs to come clean and IMMEDIATELY stop
claiming that he represents "Open source", "GPL licencing" when all he
is doing is supplying a broken assembler under his own private licence.
SHAME ON YOU BETOV !!!
Trying to capitalise on they years of hard work that the programmers
who wrote the LINUX operating system have done to flog your own crappy
political agenda.
Regards,
hutch at movsd dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- From: Alex
- Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- Prev by Date: Re: count2.asm
- Next by Date: Re: Which assembler can handle the BIG stuff ?
- Previous by thread: statistic
- Next by thread: Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|