Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- From: "Alex" <alex@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:50:13 +1000
Hutch
maybe you should give it a rest.
stop feeding the trolls
"hutch--" <hutch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1122507241.261188.43200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Contrary to Betov stated view, the licence for RosAsm is definitely NOT
> a GNU Organisation GPL licence, it is a licence written by Guga for
> Betov with his RosAsm project. Now this is of course Betov's right to
> licence his software in any way he likes but it is directly DISHONEST
> to claim that it is a GNU Organisation GPL licence when it is not.
>
> Betov imposes conditions on a user over and above the GPL system and
> this is while supporting the proprietry Microsoft Windows operating
> system and a dead in the water clone of it. GPL has its major working
> example in the LINUX operating system that was built under the GPL
> licence yet Betov does not support the GPL flagship, he is a WINDOWS
> man.
>
> Claiming to be GPL when it clearly is not is a COPYRIGHT VIOLATION of
> the GNU organisation. Betov needs to come clean and IMMEDIATELY stop
> claiming that he represents "Open source", "GPL licencing" when all he
> is doing is supplying a broken assembler under his own private licence.
>
> SHAME ON YOU BETOV !!!
>
> Trying to capitalise on they years of hard work that the programmers
> who wrote the LINUX operating system have done to flog your own crappy
> political agenda.
>
> Regards,
>
> hutch at movsd dot com
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- From: hutch--
- Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- References:
- When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- From: hutch--
- When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HAY Betov, still no support for GPL or LINUX, WHY ????
- Next by Date: Re: Pointer Arrays on amd64 (BSD/linux)
- Previous by thread: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- Next by thread: Re: When will Betov come clean on GPL ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|