Re: model of Z
- From: "Beth" <BethStone21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:59:15 GMT
T.M. Sommers wrote:
> I did not express myself well. What I meant was that the rule
> given by Beth was not the whole story. I was not criticizing
> your English.
And just in case that it wasn't understood when I wrote it, I wasn't
trying to be "exhaustive" in the description...merely "illustrative"...
So, yes, it's not the whole story...but the whole story is much too long
a story (which, if you want every plural and exception in the entire
language then I don't know the whole story to be able to tell it, anyway
:)...
Hence, I was just giving you the back cover "brief synopsis" of the
story there...
Beth :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- Re: model of Z
- References:
- model of Z
- From: ¬a\\/b
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Evenbit
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Beth
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Beth
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- model of Z
- Prev by Date: Re: Type Checking, C vs. Assembly, & other stuff
- Next by Date: Re: The revelation of St. f0dder the Divine
- Previous by thread: Re: model of Z
- Next by thread: Re: model of Z
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|