Re: Bugs in donkey.lib

The persistence even in the face of clear proof using the Sysinternals
Process Explorer after having developed the originals using Task
manager with its processor percentage of less than 1% is why I take no
notice of you.

Microsoft Task Manager 0% change
Sysinternals Process Explorer 0% processor usage

A measure ZERO percent shows the sum total of argument against the use
of polling loops to be mistaken. There is still a fundamental flaw in
your argument that you can ever get anything for nothing.

Delegating the processor usage to the OS is only shifting the burden as
for a computer of the x86 type to run, it ONLY DETERMINES time based
intervals by periodically POLLING events.

Your problem is you are trying to argue against a fundamental
programming technique which is time proven superior technology on the
basis of "current fashion" where all you are offering is clunky remote
control access to an OS POLLING LOOP.

> If you get 7% idle CPU usage, something is wrong with your system.

You appear to be confusing a hyper threading OS version with Win2000,
it does not properly support that capacity. You may have different
mileage but I get faultless OS installations tha run reliably for years
with no virus/trojan infections and about all that defeats it is
hardware failure.

Now what this has to do with fixing the defects in donkey.lib escapes
me.

Regards,

hutch at movsd dot com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SysLink Control Problem
    ... I reproduce this issue on my machine, and I can see in the Process Explorer that the two versions of the ComCtl32 loaded by Word. ... Microsoft Online Community Support ... You can send feedback directly to my manager at: ... reproduce the problem in an Outlook COM addin based on KB 230689. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui)
  • Re: why got ?? in the path ?
    ... I don't know offhand the reason but I would download Process Explorer from ... SysInternals to see what it shows in the process properties as the path. ... > Wrote a small program on XP to get a list of running processes. ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: why got ?? in the path ?
    ... I don't know offhand the reason but I would download Process Explorer from ... SysInternals to see what it shows in the process properties as the path. ... > Wrote a small program on XP to get a list of running processes. ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: why got ?? in the path ?
    ... I don't know offhand the reason but I would download Process Explorer from ... SysInternals to see what it shows in the process properties as the path. ... > Wrote a small program on XP to get a list of running processes. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: why got ?? in the path ?
    ... I don't know offhand the reason but I would download Process Explorer from ... SysInternals to see what it shows in the process properties as the path. ... > Wrote a small program on XP to get a list of running processes. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)