Re: model of Z
- From: "Beth" <BethStone21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:24:36 GMT
T.M. Sommers wrote:
> Beth wrote:
> > T.M. Sommers wrote:
> >>I did not express myself well. What I meant was that the rule
> >>given by Beth was not the whole story. I was not criticizing
> >>your English.
> >
> > And just in case that it wasn't understood when I wrote it, I wasn't
> > trying to be "exhaustive" in the description...merely
"illustrative"...
>
> And just in case you didn't notice, I was responding to a
> specific question from Wolfgang.
I did notice...
I was, like you, just "being explicit" to ensure the point was
understood...
> > So, yes, it's not the whole story...but the whole story is much too
long
>
> Too long? Coming from you? That's a first.
Exactly; Gives a good indication of the length of the "story" when even
I think it's far too long to recount ;)...
Beth :)
.
- References:
- model of Z
- From: ¬a\\/b
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Alex McDonald
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Evenbit
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Beth
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: Beth
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- Re: model of Z
- From: wolfgang kern
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- Re: model of Z
- From: Beth
- Re: model of Z
- From: T.M. Sommers
- model of Z
- Prev by Date: Re: Polling loop good here???
- Next by Date: Re: Webster hits 6,000,000!
- Previous by thread: Re: model of Z
- Next by thread: Re: model of Z
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|