Re: Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- From: "Charles A. Crayne" <ccrayne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:42:43 -0700
On 30 Aug 2005 08:14:46 -0700
"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:To begin with, it's important to realize that no single pedagogy
:(teaching method) is going to work for *everyone*.
This is, indeed, a key point. However, your categories deal far more with
what material needs to be taught, than with how to teach it. Therefore, let
me suggest an orthogonal set of categories.
To begin with, there are those of us who prefer to learn from reference
materials, and, in those cases where the materials are unclear, from
explanations, or example code, which we find on the web.
Others learn better with the structure provided by self-study courses,
tutorials, and so forth.
And yet others learn best with both structure and supervision -- the
traditional classroom method.
There are, of course, no clear lines of demarcation between these
categories.
-- Chuck
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- References:
- Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- Prev by Date: Re: Polling loop good here???
- Next by Date: Re: Iczelion's tutorials revisited.
- Previous by thread: Re: Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part 2
- Next by thread: Re: Teaching (and Learning) Assembly Language, Part I
- Index(es):