Re: f0dder's Fabulous Wait States.

With the same level of assumption about unproven truisms, feel free to
assume whatever you like but do fix that procedure you posted as an
example, I can nitpick lousy code in my sleep and until you zero fill
that structure and put the correct length into it, your code is
dangerous and has no garrantee that it will run on a later version.
Then put the structure witin the procedure as a local so it is both
re-entrant and free of cache problems.

Its a case of picking the tree out of your own eye before you try and
invent a splinter in mine. If you know so little about testing, at
least don't burden me with your mistakes but do feel free to create the
non-polling version of a message loop and a WndProc with precanned high
level wait state API function calls.

Regards,

hutch at movsd dot com

.