Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Ludwig Hähne <wkx@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 23:55:15 +0200
f0dder schrieb:
And honestly, the b_u_asm.exe interface sucks. HTML would have made so much more sense.
I agree that it could be better, but at least it isn't in PDF ... :)
I've made an attempt to port the RosAsm docs to an intermediate format that can be converted to HTML (+CHM) a few month ago by abusing doxygen. However, I must admit that I had underestimated the amount of work of reorganizing the hundreds of pages in B_U_Asm; furthermore doxygen was probably not the best choice for this job. But maybe I'll continue to work on it in autumn so that at least the assembler + IDE reference documentation would be available in alternative formats. Until then B_U_Asm should be sufficient as it has been for all those who have learnt RosAsm so far :)
Regards, Ludwig .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Betov
- Re: Windows Assembly
- References:
- Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: JGCASEY
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Philip Smith
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: wolfgang kern
- Windows Assembly
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Assembly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|