Paging Beth Stone (was: 'Re: Windows Assembly')
- From: "Annie" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:50:30 -0500
On 2005-09-14 spamandviruses@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> Annie wrote:
>
> > Seems like you SHOULD be able to switch the processor into
> > Virtual-86 mode, do your video-mode manipulations, and then
> > switch back to protected mode.
>
> Yes, it's possible, but Linux is one undocumented little ***.
> I was going to do that, since that would give me any mode I wanted
> under any possible circumstance, but I couldn't find the details of
> the vm86 system call anywhere. In fact, if I found the necessary
> details, I'd give up this Windows *** right this second. Doing
> the VESA via VM86 thing would be a bit of a bitch, but the reason I
> gave up on Linux was because what I wanted wasn't possible, not
> because it was difficult.
_____
You may have come to the right ((( `\
place. The LuxASM development _ _`\ )
team (LuxASM is a forthcoming (^ ) )
specific assembler for Linux) ~-( )
hangs out in this newsgroup. _'((,,,)))
,-' \_/ `\
Beth Stone, one of the team ( , |
members, made it her project `-.-'`-.-'/|_|
to document all of the Linux \ / | |
system calls. =()=: / ,' aa
HEY BETH! Help this guy out,
won't you?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Paging Beth Stone
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Paging Beth Stone
- References:
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by thread: Re: Paging Beth Stone
- Index(es):