Re: Windows Assembly
- From: "JGCASEY" <jgkjcasey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Sep 2005 17:13:46 -0700
Richard Cooper wrote:
>
> Now I'm not debating that at all. The HLA
> language is a perfectly valid assembly language
> in my opinion. (it still has processor registers
> and instructions, so it's more assembly language
> than it is anything else) It's just that the HLA
> program is not an assembler, it creates output for
> MASM and so it is a preprocessor.
Doesn't that make *any* HLL with an inline assembler
an assembler in the sense that they also have processor
register and instructions?
When I use assembler in a C procedure am I doing
assembly programming?
-
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- References:
- Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: sevagK
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Philip Smith
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: sevagK
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: sevagK
- Re: Windows Assembly
- From: Richard Cooper
- Windows Assembly
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Assembly
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Assembly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|