Re: What happened to Hygram?
- From: "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:17:11 -0700
andrewspencers@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Thanks for the copy, but I worded my question unclearly.
> I meant what happened to the Hygram notation itself, not what happened
> to the file describing it; I already had the files (html and pdf
> versions) in my browser cache.
> The abstract (extant in my cached versions) indicated that it was
> intended as more than just a course exercise, so I was curious whether
> it's been used as more, and if not, then why not, and should it be. A
> google web and newsgroups search turned up nothing.
No, it was just a course exercise. I've used it once or twice to
describe some grammars I've created, but it's not really been used for
anything practical in the real world. In particular, I've never gotten
around to defining a syntax for the semantic actions section (which has
been left as an "ad-hoc" item in HyGram), I've never created a "parser
generator" for HyGram (which is what it would be really useful for),
and I've never bothered pushing HyGram as an alternative to EBNF. As
such, it's pretty much languished.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
.
- References:
- What happened to Hygram?
- From: andrewspencers
- Re: What happened to Hygram?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What happened to Hygram?
- From: andrewspencers
- What happened to Hygram?
- Prev by Date: Theoretical Computer Science and Disassemblers
- Next by Date: Re: Theoretical Computer Science and Disassemblers
- Previous by thread: Re: What happened to Hygram?
- Next by thread: Re: resource files and assembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|