Re: Multiprocessor Core
- From: "randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2005 12:17:45 -0700
emu8086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I propose up to a hundred or even more separate microprocessor cores,
> that would be controlled by central microprocessor... That may allow
> running much more than a 4 separate threads without loosing the
> productivity.
>
> What may the leading assembly programmers share on the subject?
>
> Any thoughts?
I'm not sure what assembly has to do with it, but you do realize that
the "central microprocessor" will become the bottleneck, throttling
down the performance of the entire system, right?
Note that once you get above four processor, you reach the point of
diminishing returns in standard shared memory multiprocessor systems.
You need special busses to get decent performance above that point.
Also, if you're trying to improve the performance of a single
application via multithreading, it's real hard to get good performance
gains except for specialized algorithms once you get above 4-16
threads.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiprocessor Core
- From: emu8086
- Re: Multiprocessor Core
- References:
- Multiprocessor Core
- From: emu8086
- Multiprocessor Core
- Prev by Date: Re: read floppy problem
- Next by Date: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Previous by thread: Multiprocessor Core
- Next by thread: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Index(es):