Re: Multiprocessor Core
- From: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:17:57 -0400
emu8086@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I propose up to a hundred or even more separate microprocessor cores, that would be controlled by central microprocessor... That may allow running much more than a 4 separate threads without loosing the productivity.
What may the leading assembly programmers share on the subject?
I dunno.
Any thoughts?
But if I may answer anyway... My thought on it is that this is going to ask a lot of programmers - especially compiler-writers. Making efficient use of such a setup would take some slick programming, I would think. With some exceptions, I don't see that the software we've got does an especially good job of managing the hardware we've got. I fear that this could make the situation worse. Much of the hardware is likely to be sitting idle much of the time, simply due to a lack of anything useful to do. When a "peak load" (of unknown size and duration?) comes along, parcelling out the labor in an optimal manner seems like a programming nightmare to me.
That's just based on a "feeling", not on any factual knowledge of how such a beast would be programmed.
Best, Frank .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiprocessor Core
- From: emu8086
- Re: Multiprocessor Core
- References:
- Multiprocessor Core
- From: emu8086
- Multiprocessor Core
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Next by Date: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Previous by thread: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Next by thread: Re: Multiprocessor Core
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|