Re: King Log vs King Stork
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 03 Nov 2005 09:14:34 GMT
"Charles A. Crayne" <ccrayne@xxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:20051102181805.43a55f72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> As a result of a number of complaints
You did not have a _number_ of complaints. You had _Hutch_
and _Randall_ complaints. Two HLLers who works daily
_against_ Assembly, and who, after having lost all debates
at ALA, thought they would have been free to spread their
insanities the easier way on a moderated News Group, and
therefore who where much dispited when making up their
vicious minds that it could not work either, unless _all_
of my posts pointing to flat facts, could be ban.
> that I was allowing too much of the
> gamesmanship from this newsgroup to seep into clax86, I am raising the
> alert level -- perhaps "even gone a bit too far, to drive the message
> home". If a post even hints at being part of an ongoing dispute from
this
> newsgroup, it will be returned, with a suggestion that it be posted
here.
Glad to hear that, now on, you will remove any post saying
that HLA is an Assembler, that Master Randall Hyde is an
Assembly expert, that MASM32 is the Assembly standard, and
so on, and so on.
> Please do not take this personally. :-)
Nope. I just point to facts. Nothing personal, is it?
:)
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: King Log vs King Stork
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Re: King Log vs King Stork
- From: hutch--
- Re: King Log vs King Stork
- References:
- King Log vs King Stork
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- King Log vs King Stork
- Prev by Date: Re: Oh No! Open Source Again!
- Next by Date: Re: Oh No! Open Source Again!
- Previous by thread: King Log vs King Stork
- Next by thread: Re: King Log vs King Stork
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|