Re: GAS struc
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Nov 2005 14:49:42 GMT
James Buchanan <software.au@xxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:43807df4$0$30812
> Betov wrote:
>> James Buchanan <ask-me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
>> news:437ff04d$0$30799 $5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>> Without an assembler, GCC is useless.
>> GCC does not claim to be an _ASSEMBLER_, clown.
> I didn't say it was an assembler. You are claiming that because HLA
> doesn't write object files, it is just a preprocessor
This is the definition of a Pre-Processor, Troll.
> and not an
> assembler. If you accept that, GCC is not really a compiler, just a
> preprocessor converting some human readable text to another.
> That's YOUR argument.
I have no problem with GCC claiming to be a Compiler,
even if it does not having any Encoder inside. An HLL
may have its Encoder inside or outside, this does not
change a thing to the fact that the whole thing makes
a Compiler. Front-End, Back-End, or all in one, does
not make any practical difference.
As for the Assemblers area, as you do not know a word
of what Assembly is about, the discussion is useless:
First, go and learn the basics of Assembly Programming,
with an _ASSEMBLER_, of course, and come back when you
are done, so that you will, at least, have an idea of
what you are talking about.
For now, as long as you defend Master Pdf swindlings,
this is more than enough to make sure that you are a
perfect nobody failing to understand the debate.
< http://rosasm.org >
- Re: GAS struc
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GAS struc
- Prev by Date: Re: GAS struc
- Next by Date: Re: Structs in Assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: GAS struc
- Next by thread: Re: GAS struc