Re: OT:Some thoughts
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 12:40:18 GMT
"hal9000" <hal9000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:1132918330.568171.186000
@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> I always believed in the right tools for the right job. RosAsm for
> smaller windows apps, and rapidly prototyping ideas; HLA and MASM32
> for large complex tasks that need more than one programmer working on
> them. I could also use HLA and MASM32 for smaller apps, but I really
> l.ike using RosAsm for it, no other reason than personal preference and
> it does what I want it to. Just like I like using HLA and MASM32 for
> large tasks, it just makes my life so much easier.
This sounds to me so "incoherent" that i want to see
_facts_.
1) HLA and MASM are in no way proper tools for writting
"large tasks" and, as far as i can known, we have
never seen any "large tasks" written with them.
2) As opposed RosAsm is _THE_ Tool for writing large tasks
in Assembly, even for collective developments, as
demonstrated by the developments of RosAsm itself. Just
search for some other Assembly Source over 3 Megas, and
tell us if you find a couple of example.
So, not calling you a liar from scratch... Please, post Links
to prove your words.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT:Some thoughts
- From: the\-\o/-/annabee
- Re: OT:Some thoughts
- References:
- OT:Some thoughts
- From: hal9000
- OT:Some thoughts
- Prev by Date: OT:Some thoughts
- Next by Date: Re: GAS struc
- Previous by thread: OT:Some thoughts
- Next by thread: Re: OT:Some thoughts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|