Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2005 19:32:02 GMT
"randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1133204755.594622.232030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> The only problem is that very few people are
> buying into his little fantasy.
No ass-hole, this is not a real problem. Of course,
your propaganda system may temporary succeed to slow
down the Assembly Rebirth, by the grace of the damage
you inflict to Assembly, but, viewed in the long term,
this motion will evidently pass on you.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- References:
- Re: GAS struc
- From: Spam Killer
- Re: GAS struc
- From: James Buchanan
- Re: GAS struc
- From: Spam Killer
- Re: GAS struc
- From: James Buchanan
- Re: GAS struc
- From: Spam Killer
- What is an assembly language?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: The_Sage
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: The_Sage
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: The_Sage
- Re: What is an assembly language?
- From: Dean Kent
- Why there are so many assemblers.
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GAS struc
- Prev by Date: Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- Next by Date: Re: OT:Some thoughts
- Previous by thread: Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- Next by thread: Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- Index(es):