Re: Another interesting article on Open Source


Robert Redelmeier wrote:

> The GPL certainly does not, and very pointedly _DOES NOT_
> grant (5) and possibly (4) if "free" is taken as
> "without restriction" as opposed to "costless".

I take it you assumed I meant GPL in the post :-)
Actually, I was thinking of another license often bandied around here
that fails the "for any purpose" clause.
Cheers,
Randy Hyde

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lisp on Lines
    ... Clisp is GPL, with an LGPL-like exception for saved ... images. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Searching a GPL tool to convert PPT to Flash
    ... Michael Koerner wrote: ... > General Public License ... > What's GPL? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.powerpoint)
  • Re: GNU
    ... GPL does not require you to ... Incident Based Support ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Open Source Distributive Cache solution
    ... nice with WebLogic/WebSphere. ... Its under GPL. ... HTH, ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: GPL to NR2003 w/ Noonan Converter
    ... A straight, no frills conversion from GPL to NR2003 works fine, it's ... when the extra files are added to the mix that the error occurs. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.autos.simulators)