Re: License Choice
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Nov 2005 09:20:10 GMT
"\\\-\oannabee Taratitatita Hey" <faq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:1133308601.554900.299000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Except, I never used the term "personal and social
> lack of organization". I was talking about personal thinking. Personal
> awareness, and in particular, the individual developed thinking. You
> cannot have a highly developed etical sosiety, unless the individuals
> are also highly developed ethical thinkers.In the same way you cannot
> build a brickwall, unless you have any bricks.
Your own example, is not any argument to reject the
political concept:
* If a bad home maker makes use of good brick, he will
build a bad house.
* If a good home maker makes use of good bricks, but
has to conform to the decisions of demential architect
this will be a bad house.
* Even, with everything perfect, if the house is not
what the final inhabitant was wanting, it will yet
not be a good house for him.
All of this is politic. And nowadays, as Democraty is
fadding out, as we can no more decide any plan, nor
any collective choice, actions like Anti-GMO, GPLing
SoftWare, defending women rights, and so on..., _are_
political actions. The last ones we can still do in
the actual collapse. And mind you, in the "other camp",
they perfectly understand all of this. As you seem to
read french, here is a "funny" example Rémi pointed me
to:
< http://www.generation-nt.com/actualites/10463/Interdire-des-logiciels-
libres-en-France >
:))
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- License Choice
- From: Bal Oney
- Re: License Choice
- From: Betov
- Re: License Choice
- From: \-\o/-/annabee Taratitatita Hey
- Re: License Choice
- From: Betov
- Re: License Choice
- From: \\\-\oannabee Taratitatita Hey
- License Choice
- Prev by Date: Re: Why there are so many assemblers.
- Previous by thread: Re: License Choice
- Next by thread: Re: License Choice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|